Can Nuclear Energy ETFs Live Up To Their Promise?
22 February 2010 at 12:08 pm by Gary Gordon
In the White House, you have an exceptionally strong advocate for cleaner energy. President Obama frequently touts the virtues of the nuclear option.
Overseas, China has become surprisingly active in clean energy development. Estimates suggest that the country is spending $110 billion annually on clean energy development, with a stated goal to make renewable energy account for 15% of its total by 2020.
Based on supply, demand, “polita-speak,” and potential for business profit, one might think that the lights would turn on inside investors’ heads. For instance, Western and Eastern suppliers are already responding to the trend towards greater nuclear energy in the world’s 2nd/3rd largest economy, China.
And there’s more.
There are nearly 100 plans for new reactors around the world today, from Russia (with love) to India to Japan. Also, according to Rebecca Smith at WSJ, McDermott International and the Tennessee Valley Authority are pushing for commercial use approval on a small-sized nuclear reactor in the U.S. (Decades have gone by without new nuclear plants in the U.S.)
So with all of the momentum, why does Market Vectors Nuclear Energy (NLR) struggle below a 200-Day moving average? And shouldn’t an investor be able to anticipate greater capital appreciation from a sub-sector fund (i.e., global nuclear energy) over a broad global index like the iSharesGlobal 100 Index Fund (IOO)?
There are other nuclear energy ETFs to choose from. However, both PowerShares Global Nuclear Energy (PKL) as well as iShares Global Nuclear Energy (NUCL) have been around less than 2 years; both have less trading volume and assets than NLR; both are highly correlated to NLR at this point in time; all 3 nuclear options have underperformed the iShares Global 100 Index (IOO) since respective inception.
There is one positive thing that an investor might be able to say about nuclear energy. It has performed about as well as traditional energy in iShares Global Energy (IXC); moreover, Nuclear Energy (NLR) has outhustled Global Wind (FAN), Global Solar(TAN) and Global Alternative Energy (GEX) over similar time frames.
You can listen to the ETF Expert Radio Show “LIVE”, via podcast or on your iPod. You can review more ETF Expert features here.
Disclosure Statement: ETF Expert is a web log (”blog”) that makes the world of ETFs easier to understand. Gary Gordon, MS, CFP is the president of Pacific Park Financial, Inc., a Registered Investment Adviser with the SEC. The company and/or its clients may hold positions in the ETFs, mutual funds and/or index funds mentioned above. The company does not receive compensation from any of the fund providers covered in this feature. Moreover, the commentary does not constitute individualized investment advice. The opinions offered herein are not personalized recommendations to buy, sell or hold securities. Investors who are interested in money management services may visit the Pacific Park Financial, Inc.web site.
Tags | "energy nuclear etf", "etf nuclear energy", "etf nuclear", "etfs nuclear", "global nuclear etf", "nuclear etfs", Energy ETFs

















